America put me out of business homepage
1465  days in business since  challenge
3168  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

New Law aims to stop 'rouge' online pharmacies

Posted At Winchester Sun

By: Tim Weldon

A new state law designed to make it more difficult to obtain prescription drugs from Internet pharmacies goes into effect today, but some law enforcement officials are already predicting that it's not likely to do much to prevent people from obtaining drugs online.

Even Sen. R.J. Palmer, D-Winchester, who co-sponsored Senate Bill 63, says he doesn't expect the law to be the panacea that will put an end to what he calls a "rampant problem."

Palmer said, "I'm hopeful that it will be effective at combating (Internet drug sales), although I have to admit that I have some questions about whether it will reach to the extent that I had hoped it would."

SB 63, which is primarily intended to make it more difficult to obtain ingredients used to manufacture methamphetamines, also contains provisions that require Internet pharmacies to be licensed to sell and ship prescription drugs to people in Kentucky.

Violating the law will be a class C felony, punishable by 5-10 years in prison.

Mike Burleson, Director of the Kentucky Board of Physicians, says so-called cyberpharmacies will not be able to receive a state permit unless they first obtain national certification from the Verified Internet Pharmacy Practice Sites (VIPPS). That six-year-old program, operated by the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, sets strict membership guidelines that will prevent nonlegitimate Internet pharmacies from being accepted, according to Burleson.

Merely applying for VIPPS certification is costly, running between $4,375 to $7,375, depending on the type of medications sold. If approved for membership, there are also inspection fees, participation fees and facility fees that would run into the thousands of dollars for a cyberpharmacy.

Nobody knows how many cyberpharmacies are operating, but in January 2004, Palmer said 157 were documented, with only 6 percent requiring a written prescription from a physician who actually saw the patient in person. The vast majority will write prescriptions for patients without seeing them face to face. Those, Burleson says, would not qualify for VIPPS certification and therefore will not be licensed to operate in Kentucky.

Currently, only 14 online pharmacies have VIPPS certification, according to the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy Web site.

Burleson says another provision of the new law will prevent some people from using nonlicensed pharmacies to order narcotics. It allows shipping companies to seize as contraband any package that is believed to contain controlled substances from a nonlicensed source.

"If they can seize these prescriptions, once they confiscate them, these folks are not going to want to order them. If you're ordering $5,000 worth of this medication a month and if all of a sudden it's going to be seized before you get it but your credit card has already been billed, you're not going to want to order it again," Burleson said.

But critics point out that in many cases, prescription drugs are shipped C.O.D. (cash on delivery). Therefore, purchasers would not lose any money if drug shipments were seized, although the cyberpharmacies would in those cases.

Some law enforcement officials say the new law lacks teeth needed for a full-scale assault on the Internet drug trade.

"I don't even know if this new law will help, to be honest with you. I hope it does, but I'm really skeptical," Clark County Sheriff Ray Caudill said.

He argues that a person should not be able to buy narcotics without actually seeing a doctor face-to-face and getting a prescription from that doctor. The majority of cyberpharmacies ask for a written description of a medical problem and require a telephone consultation with a practitioner. Some require the client to fax medical records. However, there is no face-to-face visit with a doctor and little to prove that medical records are accurate.

"At this point, we're doing what we can," Palmer explained. "The resolution to the problem tends to be a moving target. We have to try to improve things in order to curtail the problem that we're trying to curtail."

Palmer concedes the solution may have to come from Congress. A bill, known as the Ryan Haight Internet Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2005 has been filed in both the House and Senate in Washington, D.C. The bill, which is named after a 17-year-old from California who died from an overdose of drugs obtained from the Internet, would place strict controls on Internet sites selling prescription drugs.

It would prohibit Internet drug sales if the purchaser did not already have a valid prescription and if it involved an online consultation with a medical practitioner who did not actually see the person buying the drugs face-to-face.

Sixth District Congressman Ben Chandler, D-Versailles, says solving the Internet drug problem probably will require federal legislation, and he says he supports the Haight Act.

"It's a good bill," Chandler said. "The problem that we know about is that people have the ability to get these drugs very easily online. It allows for easy trafficking of narcotics and it exacerbates the prescription drug problems that we know we have in this country."

As Kentucky's attorney general, Chandler was instrumental in creating the Kentucky All-Schedule Prescription Electronic Reporting, or KASPER, which requires pharmacies to report to the state the names of anyone purchasing narcotics in an attempt to crack down on doctor or pharmacy shopping. Chandler says one problem with KASPER is that some drug addicts or dealers would buy drugs from pharmacies outside Kentucky, which did not have a system similar to KASPER.

Chandler explains that's why an attack on Internet drug sales needs to come from Washington, not from individual states.

"Congress, if they stop just a handful of these rogue pharmacies, I think they've done some good," Chandler said.


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006