America put me out of business homepage
1465  days in business since  challenge
3168  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

Measure blocks drug-import bans

Posted At The Courier-Journal

By: James Carroll

WASHINGTON -- Challenging President Bush and Republican leaders, Rep. Anne Northup has won a battle in her campaign to allow Americans to buy less expensive drugs from other countries.

The House Appropriations Committee passed an amendment from Northup on a voice vote Tuesday that would block future trade agreements from including bans on the reimportation of prescription drugs.

But House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, predicted Northup's amendment "somehow" would be dropped as it moves through Congress.

Northup, R-3rd District, said yesterday she had not talked to DeLay about the issue recently.

"I've already had enough direct conversations and frank conversations with Tom DeLay to know I'm going to have win it fair and square," Northup said.

DeLay's office did not return a call seeking further comment.

Northup acknowledged tension between her and GOP leaders on the issue. But she said she doesn't expect repercussions "because a majority (of House Republicans) agrees with me."

Prescription drugs are less expensive in some other countries, including Canada, which has led some Americans to cross the border to buy them or order them online. It is against the law to do so, but enforcement is rare.

Drug companies say reimportation violates their patents.

Three recent U.S. trade agreements with Australia, Singapore and Morocco have included provisions promising to protect U.S. drug patents.

But Northup said those provisions were the work of American pharmaceutical companies that want to stop the importation of drugs from other nations.

If Congress passes such legislation, she said in an interview yesterday, it would violate the three trade agreements. That would subject U.S. products to higher tariffs as retaliation for the trade violations. "What the pharmaceutical industry was doing was end-running Congress," said Northup, an Appropriations Committee member.

Northup's amendment was attached to a spending bill for the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, the Department of Commerce and other agencies.

The bill is likely to be voted on in the full House next week.

Jennifer Page, spokeswoman for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, said U.S. trade negotiators -- not drug companies -- negotiated the terms of the agreements.

"We were not in the room during these trade agreements, so how could we be pushing for it to get it in there?" Page said.

Ken Johnson, the pharmaceutical industry group's senior vice president, said in a statement that Northup's provision "seriously undermines all U.S. knowledge-based industries."

Northup's proposal would hinder the trade representative's power "to protect fully the rights of all U.S. patent holders abroad in future trade agreements," Johnson said.

Northup disputed that.

"The patents that our companies have are protected by U.S. law -- they're not protected by trade agreements," she said.

Companies "can recover damages though infringement on those patents through the courts," she said.

The House last year passed legislation allowing the importation of drugs, but the Senate did not take up the measure.

New legislation on the matter is pending in the House and Senate this year.

Appropriations Committee Chairman Rep. Jerry Lewis, R-Calif., voted for Northup's amendment, although he is concerned about whether it would affect U.S. patent law, spokesman Jim Specht said.

Lewis has asked committee lawyers to review the issue, and so far they have had conflicting findings, Specht said.

Lewis also is concerned about Northup's provision "because of leadership's opposition," Specht said.

The pharmaceutical and health-products industry last year gave $17.5 million to political campaigns -- two-thirds of it to Republicans, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

Recipients included President Bush's campaign, which got more than $1 million, as well as House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., and DeLay. Democrats who got industry money included presidential candidate and Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., and Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind.

The Associated Press contributed to this story.


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006