America put me out of business homepage
1465  days in business since  challenge
3168  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

Northup backs drug import bill

Posted At Kentucky Courier-Journal

By: James R. Carroll

WASHINGTON -- Rep. Anne Northup is joining forces with a bipartisan group of House members and senators in an effort to allow imports of cheaper prescription drugs.

Northup, R-3rd District, said a bill will be unveiled today at a Capitol Hill press conference to bar restrictions in future trade agreements on Americans buying medicine from other countries.

"The trade representative can change, administrations can change, but I think that they shouldn't be fixing this policy," Northup said yesterday.

"The question of whether consumers have access to the international market (for drugs) ought to be a decision that Congress makes and people in policy-making positions make -- people that are elected," she said.

The White House did not respond yesterday to a request for comment. But the Bush administration, House Republican leaders and the pharmaceutical industry have opposed making it easier to buy drugs from abroad. The Department of Health and Human Services has not certified drug importation as safe.

The White House last month issued a position statement saying it would fight any provision "that purports to limit the president's exercise of the exclusive authority vested in him by the Constitution to negotiate agreements with foreign countries and international organizations."

Ken Johnson, senior vice president for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the industry's trade group, said in a statement that the group had not seen the new measure, "but our position on importation remains the same."

"We oppose any legislative scheme that would bypass the (Food and Drug Administration's) strict safety system and puts health at risk," he said.

"If it mirrors other flawed legislation already being discussed, it could allow drugs from countries like Slovenia, Slovakia, Estonia and Latvia to come into the country," Johnson said. "Vulnerable patients would be compelled to play Russian roulette and to take medicines that could be tainted or dangerous."

Northup and other members of Congress are upset over recent trade agreements with Australia, Singapore and Morocco that prohibit drug imports from those nations, even if Congress makes such imports legal.

She and her allies earlier attached an amendment to a House spending bill to stop such provisions in future trade agreements, but the Senate version of the spending measure does not have a similar provision.

And even if the provision survives final negotiations, it would be good for only one year, Northup said.

"We felt like we needed something a little broader," she said of the legislation for a permanent change, called the "Protecting Free Trade in Pharmaceuticals Act of 2005."

Northup is co-sponsoring the measure with Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., and Sens. David Vitter, R-La., and Deborah Stabenow, D-Mich.

Northup said the pharmaceutical industry secured the bans on drug imports in the recent trade agreements as part of an effort to preserve high drug prices in the U.S. market.

The industry group has denied shaping the trade agreements in its favor. But drug companies have said that allowing drug imports in future trade agreements could interfere with the rights of U.S. patent holders.

Northup and the other sponsors of the new legislation also are proposing that an advisory panel to the U.S. trade representative, which includes the pharmaceutical industry, also include consumers.

"They're not represented," Northup said.


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006