America put me out of business homepage
1465  days in business since  challenge
3168  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

Drug debate causes clash within GOP

Posted At The Times-Picayune

By: Bruce Alpert

WASHINGTON -- The debate over legislation that would allow cheaper drugs to be imported to the United States sparked a rare public clash between Republican lawmakers Tuesday.

Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., accused Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, a co-sponsor of a leading drug-importation bill, of evading his questions about how it would affect long-standing U.S. drug-safety rules.

Gregg interrupted Snowe several times, admonishing her for "not answering my question" and suggesting that her bill is a political gesture rather than a serious response to high drug prices. The harshness of Gregg's questioning, during a Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing, indicates the intensity of the issue.

Snowe and co-sponsor Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., said that Gregg was being misleading by suggesting that the legislation would allow importation of drugs not now legal in the United States. They said their bill would allow importation of only drugs already approved by the FDA.

The Capitol Hill fireworks erupted as the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association, led by former Louisiana Congressman Billy Tauzin, is launching its attack against the legislation. The association last week released a report questioning the safety of drug importation and is touting polls conducted by groups affiliated with the industry that say the effort is not as popular as many politicians think.

But Sen. David Vitter, R-La., who has introduced his own drug-importation bill, said the industry's assault is evidence that the importation movement is gaining momentum.

"I take this as a great compliment," Vitter said. "I think this is perhaps the clearest political proof that this has enormous momentum and is in the process of happening."

Tauzin, president and CEO of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers Association, noted the PhRMA-commissioned report by former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, which says the risk of importing drugs outweighs any potential benefits and could make the nation more vulnerable to terrorist attacks.

"We understand that some Americans are looking for cheaper drugs from abroad, but this report underscores the dangers of doing so," Tauzin said.

Tauzin also noted a poll by the Seniors Coalition, a group that gets some financing from the pharmaceutical industry, indicating that 77 percent of Louisiana seniors oppose reimportation when told that the drugs could come from 20 foreign countries.

Vitter called the poll "bogus," saying it asked questions designed to play on the fears of seniors and runs counter to virtually all objective polling on the issue. He also said that his legislation, along with the Dorgan-Snowe bill, includes safeguards to ensure that imported drugs are safe.

Many Americans already buy their drugs from Canada and have done so safely, Vitter said. Legalizing the process, he said, would set up the machinery, including Food and Drug Administration oversight, to make sure the imported drugs use the latest tamper-resistant technology and other safeguards against adulteration and misbranding of drugs.

Vitter made drug importation a major part of his Senate campaign platform last year.

"We have all heard the accounts of Americans who are forced to choose between their medication and necessities like food and rent," Vitter said. "We have all heard the accounts of senior citizens who cut their pills in half or who take their medication every other day instead of daily, because they cannot afford the costs of their prescription drugs."


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006