America put me out of business homepage
1549  days in business since  challenge
3252  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

Electronic tags should help drug makers identify fakes

Posted At: Investors's Business Daily

In recent years, U.S. regulators, patients and drug companies have acknowledged that fake drugs have made their way into the country's drug supply.It remains unclear how many of these bogus drugs are made by U.S.-based counterfeiters and how many arrive here via drug reimportation from Canada, Mexico and other countries.This much is clear:

The problem is big enough to prompt drug makers to begin testing radio frequency identification (RFID) tags, which are affixed to bottles of medicine.These electronic tags will let drug firms, wholesalers and pharmacies authenticate drugs sold in the U.S. It'll also aid the Food and Drug Administration in its efforts to crack down on bogus drugs.When the tags are affixed to bottles of medicines, the drugs can be electronically scanned everywhere they go — from the manufacturing plant to wholesale centers and retail pharmacies.

"We encode every RFID tag with a unique ID number," said Bill Allen, director of marketing for RFID at Texas Instruments, which is working on pilot projects with several large drug makers."The code is embedded in the transponder and can't be changed," Allen said. "Data encryption schemes prevent someone from just reading the tag. You can also build in other safety features to lock out those who shouldn't have access to the tag identity.

"Privately held Purdue Pharma, which makes narcotic painkillers OxyContin and Palladone, launched its RFID-tagged bottles earlier this month. Purdue is working in partnership with Symbol Technologies, which makes RFID tags, readers and antennas, as well as software firm SAP AG of Germany.Several large drug makers, including Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline, plan to do the same with certain drug brands by December 2005 and mid-2006, respectively. It'll cost each firm several million dollars to implement the program.The cost doesn't seem to bother company officials

."There are benefits," says Pfizer spokesman Bryant Haskins. "RFID would also enable us to more effectively recall products, if that became necessary, because it's an electronic pedigree system. We'd also get benefits from inventory control."Pfizer will tag its bottles of Viagra first because the brand is among the biggest targets of counterfeiters. Afterward the firm will decide whether to put tags on its other drugs.Legal issues are part of the reason drug firms are considering RFID tags.

However, thus far, manufacturers have not been successfully sued.An example occurred in 2002, when Timothy Fagan of Deer Park, N.Y. underwent an emergency liver transplant.Afterward, Fagan, then 16, took weekly injections of what he thought was Amgen's anemia drug Epogen for two months before he and his family learned the drug was a fake and contained 1/20th the strength of the real Epogen

.Fagan's family sued Amgen, which makes Epogen; drug store chain CVS Corp., where they bought the drug; and wholesaler AmerisourceBergen, which supplied CVS.A federal district court judge recently ruled that Amgen couldn't be held liable because a drug manufacturer doesn't control the drug after it sells it to the wholesaler.

Other potential benefits of RFID tags are that they provide for better supply chain management and help law enforcement officials crack down on criminals."Never before in our industry have we been able to distinguish counterfeit from authentic goods," said Aaron Graham, vice-president and chief security officer at Purdue, who previously held the same job at Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

"In the past, all we could do was say, 'Send me your bottle of potentially counterfeit drug and we'll test it in the lab.'"Graham, a former senior special agent for the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Food and Drug Administration, says the RFID tags help agents track criminals."If some bad guy tries to sell drugs to a wholesaler and the wholesaler tries to scan an RFID chip back to me, that data will show me that those bottles are wrong," he said.

"I can tell the wholesaler, 'We didn't make that product. You have suspect contraband or counterfeit goods in your possession.'"This gives him time to contact drug regulators and authorities before the criminals become aware they're being traced.RFID is new to the drug industry, but not new to large retailers.

Last year, Wal-Mart Stores set a January 2005 deadline for its top 100 suppliers to put RFID tags on cases and pallets destined for Wal-Mart and Sam's Club stores in the Dallas/Fort Worth area. Many of its suppliers already are test marketing the tags.Though RFID tags clearly have benefits for companies and patients, they're not likely to create much of a stir on Wall Street."It's really a benefit for patients because it minimizes or eliminates any form of counterfeiting," said Lehman Bros. analyst Tony Butler.

"I don't know how it would benefit investors. If it did, it would be marginal because the amount of current counterfeiting, while it exists, is not (perceived to be) terribly high."


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006