America put me out of business homepage
1357  days in business since  challenge
3060  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

Prescription drug plan is too confusing and complicated

Posted At JSonline.com

BY : George Kourpias

In theory, choice can be a good thing. So when President Bush and the Republican Congressional leadership rammed through the 2003 Medicare law, they claimed that by privatizing Medicare, seniors would have better choices.But thanks to a privatized and flawed drug benefit, 43 million Medicare recipients today are drowning in choice.

A couple of weeks ago, seniors started signing up for Medicare Part D prescription drug coverage. What they have encountered has been nothing short of mind-boggling.

Each state has an average of 40 drug plans to choose from. Premiums and co-payments differ wildly. And no two plans offer the same drug coverage. It is a Part D disaster.

The new drug coverage is simply too confusing, too complex and too overwhelming for anyone, not just seniors, to understand.

Bewildered beneficiaries are struggling to make sense of what this private drug benefit is all about. Frustrated seniors are being bombarded with mail and advertisements.

Private insurance companies stand to make huge profits if they can enroll millions of seniors, particularly healthy seniors, and are sparing no expense to promote their for-profit plans.

Retirees are receiving letters from former companies that currently provide their health care and drug coverage and wondering whether or not their current coverage, which can be far better than anything they'll find in the Part D plans, will be maintained.

It's hard to know who or what to trust when it comes to providing unbiased, helpful information.

The federal government continually promotes use of its Medicare Web site as the main source of information needed to make informed decisions, but a recent study reported that 75% of all Medicare beneficiaries have never even been on-line. For seniors who call Medicare's toll-free hotline (1-800-MEDICARE), they are stuck sitting and waiting as overwhelmed counselors try to walk beneficiaries through their choices - if they are not hearing a busy signal.

Even health care professionals bristle at the multitude of choices because it's not clear what drug plan is going to provide the best coverage for the best price.

In Wisconsin, where there are more than 800,000 Medicare beneficiaries, Wisconsin State Alliance President Leon Burzynski said he fears many seniors won't enroll in a private drug plan because they don't know how to best evaluate or make sense of the 45 or more private plans available in the state.

It's too much to comprehend, he said, and the necessary resources aren't readily available. Like most Wisconsin seniors and retirees, many older Americans are turning to friends and family to help them assess the available plans and make informed decisions. But caretakers are also plenty confused.

It didn't have to be this way. Part D is most certainly not what we fought for.

We protested against privatization and advocated for keeping the drug benefit under Medicare, where it belongs, and out of the hands of entities primarily focused on profit. We warned that the new benefit was overly complicated and that it failed to provide adequate resources to help beneficiaries.

Time and again we have demanded that Medicare have the right to negotiate lower prices with drug companies.

We have not given up in our fight for affordable and accessible drugs for all seniors. The Alliance endorses the call for extra protections for beneficiaries in the first year of the drug coverage program.

If lawmakers are really concerned with the health coverage of Medicare's beneficiaries, they should support H.R. 3861, the Medicare Informed Choice Act, which would expand the initial enrollment period from May 15, 2006 to Dec. 31, 2006, thereby delaying late-enrollment penalties.

This legislation would also protect beneficiaries who make an initial mistake by allowing a one-time change in enrollment plans in 2006, as well as protect retiree benefits for those who enroll in a private Part D drug plan.

It makes good common sense to support steps aimed at protecting our seniors from the unintended and adverse consequences resulting from this confusing and complex new program.

The Alliance also continues to support measures aimed at actually reducing drug prices. The new law deliberately protected pharmaceutical profits by diluting purchasing power and prohibiting the federal government from getting the best deal for beneficiaries and taxpayers.

That's wrong, and the Alliance supports efforts to both let Medicare negotiate the lowest drug prices as well as to allow the safe reimportation of prescription drugs from other industrialized countries. Our 3.5 million members across the country will be fighting hard for legislation that will provide seniors affordable and accessible drugs at the lowest possible price.

But until the Part D disaster is changed and replaced, seniors must focus on the plans before them. They should take the necessary time to get all the facts, ask lots of questions and evaluate all their options. Work with someone you trust to provide unbiased information.

In Wisconsin, seniors with questions about the new drug coverage benefit can call the prescription drug helpline toll-free at (866) 456-8211.

Don't let the choices paralyze you.

George J. Kourpias is president of the national Alliance for Retired Americans, a nationwide grass-roots organization based in Washington, D.C. that advocates on behalf of seniors and retired workers.


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006