America put me out of business homepage
1355  days in business since  challenge
3058  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

Let us buy Canadian drugs

Posted At Burlington Free Press

BY : Dennis McMahon

The ability of Americans to purchase safe and reasonably priced prescription medications from Canada is an important consumer protection and health issue which requires vigilance and creative problem-solving.
There are several distinct concerns within the pharmaceutical reimportation area. One is the claim by various attorneys general and consumer groups that concerted efforts by certain US pharmaceutical manufacturers to limit sales to Canada and increase prices to Canadian distributors so as to frustrate purchases of Canadian drugs by Americans constitute violations of federal and state antitrust laws.
I became involved in this issue in 2003 and have maintained regular communications with the offices of the attorneys general who have been working on it. I also registered complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, and have corresponded with Canadian public officials and organizations regarding the antitrust aspects of corporate resistance to reimportation of Canadian medications.
I chartered the Canadian American Pharmaceuticals Alliance which campaigns for reimportation and publishes a periodic “Legislative Action Bulletin“ addressed to elected officials and consumer groups throughout the U.S. and Canada. Senior officials in Quebec have expressed appreciation for documentation on the issue vis a vis its economic impact on Quebec-Vermont trade.
I have opened lines of communication with major pharmaceutical industry executives. This dialogue has been most useful and informative.
Regarding the safety of pharmaceuticals from Canada, we have reviewed the practices and procedures now in place in the European Community. Along similar lines we have proposed the creation of a joint FDA-Health Canada Pharmaceutical Safety Board modeled after the EMEA, the European Medicines Agency. I maintain regular monitoring of pharmaceutical safety procedures and developments in Europe.
Health Canada safety standards are equivalent to if not greater than FDA regulations in various aspects and thus an indicator that reimportation can be maintained on a safe basis. The creation of a joint board would harmonize U.S. and Canadian standards for mutual protection and would have the additional function of allowing fair market access for providers and consumers of prescription medication on both sides of the border.
A glance at the latest annual report of The Jean Coutu Group (PJC), Inc. provides cogent support for the removal of any government barriers to pharmaceutical reimportation on a quality control or any other basis. Entitled “A Growing North American Presence“ this report demonstrates the major Quebec pharmacy group’s Canadian and U.S. reach with retail operations including the Brooks and Eckherd chains.
Indeed, the Jean Coutu group is now the fourth largest drugstore chain in North America with 2,204 outlets including 336 Brooks stores. It operates in three Canadian provinces and 18 states from Maine to Georgia including its dominance with the Brooks stores here in Vermont. The operation of such an excellent and well-managed multinational in our state also raises the opportunity for reimportation as an incentive to regional economic development. We have been in close and continued communication with officials at the ministerial level in Quebec on this unique aspect of the pharmaceuticals issue.
I believe that the issue of reimportation was never so much a health issue but a trade issue related to the efforts of various major pharmaceutical manufacturers to control North American prescription drug pricing. In addition to the efforts being undertaken by various attorneys general as to the alleged antitrust implications of the claimed behavior of major U.S, and European pharmaceutical manufacturers, I believe that advocates of reimportation should seek an amendment to NAFTA to permit reimportation as well as address justifiable concerns expressed by Canadian federal officials over supply in that country.
Creative analysis and advocacy can fine-tune all aspects of pharmaceutical reimportation to the benefit of consumers and small business in Vermont, Quebec, and the entire region.
Reimportation is an issue that appears to have lost steam. Rest assured, we continue to do the research and background work to help keep the engine running.


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006