America put me out of business homepage
1354  days in business since  challenge
3057  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

No good answers to a complex health-care problem

Posted At MuscatineJournal.com

BY : Peter Rugg

MUSCATINE, Iowa n A health-care forum staged by Rep. Nathan Reichert, D-Muscatine, Monday night produced few concrete answers to Iowa’s perceived health-care problems, although Reichert promised to pursue relief.

More than a dozen people, all of whom had a few gray hairs, and none below the age of 40, attended the 90-minute forum at Muscatine City Hall.

Questions ranged from what could and couldn’t be covered under current Medicare plans to the possibility of purchasing lower cost prescription drugs from Canada.

hroughout the course of the evening, the word “nightmare” was used repeatedly by those in attendance.

A few mentioned giving up health insurance because they could no longer afford rising rates. Not one could understand the rules of the new Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Part D. The voluntary program, called by some the most substantial change to Medicare since it was conceived in the 1960s, is meant to subsidize prescription drug coverage through private insurance companies and to protect against high drug prices. But in recent weeks, the program has been nationally criticized for being intimidatingly complex and confusing.

Some of the attendees asked who they could contact about the new plan, and one noted that U.S. Senator Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, had been a principle supporter of the plan in his capacity as chair of the Senate Committee on Finance. When someone asked if Grassley would explain it, there was laughter. “No,” said one unidentified man. “I don’t think we’ll be seeing Chuck soon again.”

Reichert encouraged people to be vocal about their concerns, and to contact their representatives or even visit legislators in Des Moines. But most seemed unconvinced that their elected representatives could offer much help.

“I’ve written a letter to my representative before and I get a letter back telling me how much he cares,” said Dave Bradley, 56. “But I know he didn’t give a crap.”

Bradley also asked how the United States could place so low in international comparisons of health-care programs. According to the World Health Organization, the United States ranks 37th in overall health care. However, according to a World Health Organization 2000 report, the United States ranked first in patient care, which includes responsiveness to patient's needs for choice of provider, dignity, autonomy, timely care and confidentiality.

Bradley was not the only one to use a little strong language to express his dismay at the American health- care system. A local physical therapist, Paul Kraushaar, of Muscatine, compared costs and regulations on employee insurance programs to rape.

Kraushaar, president of Muscatine Physical Therapy Services, said that his employees were receiving a lesser insurance policy than their old Blue Cross/Blue Shield program because he could not afford to pay a more than 40 percent increase in rates for the old program.

Kraushaar also bemoaned the current health-care system, which he said denies patients their proper rights as consumers.

“The worst thing they ever did, when they conceived Medicare, was to cut out the consumer,” Kraushaar said, noting that almost no patient ever even feels they can ask what treatment will cost, or compare prices from different doctors.

Rep. Mark Smith, D-Marshalltown, and Nathan Vander Plaats, a representative from the office U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, joined Reichert. Throughout the forum, they mentioned legislation that had been submitted at the state level to try and lower health-care costs, although little progress had been made on any of it in recent years.

“It’s a lot easier to stop something in the statehouse than it is to get something done, unfortunately,” said Reichert, who’s serving his first term.



ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006