America put me out of business homepage
1413  days in business since  challenge
3116  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

European price controls make drugs costlier and rarer

Posted At New Hampshire Union Leader

BY : James Glassman

EVEN AT the lofty levels of recent years, gasoline prices are a minor worry compared with health care costs. An Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development study, released earlier this month, says U.S. spending on health care per capita in 2003 was $5,635, far ahead of all other developed nations, which averaged $2,307.

Some 71 percent of Americans say they are "very or somewhat dissatisfied" with the affordability of health care, according to a Market Strategies study. That’s the single biggest dissatisfaction with the state of the nation, in a tie with poverty and homelessness and followed by federal taxes, the quality of public education, the environment, crime and energy policies.

But, while they hate what they pay, they like what they get: 82 percent of Americans are satisfied with the quality of health care they receive.

The United States has the best health care in the world. As three scholars — John Cogan, Glenn Hubbard and Daniel Kessler — write in an excellent new book published by the Hoover Institution at Stanford, "Eight of the 10 most important medical innovations of the past 30 years originated in the United States." Americans have won more Nobel Prizes in medicine than the rest of the world combined.

Look at cardiovascular disease. Mortality dropped by two-thirds between 1960 and 1995. Part of the reason was a drop in smoking, but more important was better medical care, including new drugs for high cholesterol and blood pressure and procedures like angioplasty. Another example of progress is depression, where new drugs return more than $6 in societal benefits for every $1 spent on treatment.

But is there a way to deliver great care and still reduce costs overall? The three authors (Hubbard, my colleague at the American Enterprise Institute, is a former chairman of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers) lay out a plan I find attractive — a combination of tax and malpractice reform, better information and enhanced competition.

Alas, the administration is probably too distracted to accomplish this agenda, but there is one step that can be taken now through negotiation and moral suasion.

The United States can demand that other developed countries put an end to their practice of free riding on American innovation. No wonder France, Germany and Japan can keep health care costs so low. They let U.S.-based companies spend the vast sums required to get a drug approved for the market (an average of $1.3 billion in 2003) and then use price controls and other anti-competitive devices to avoid paying the cost.

A study of 11 OECD countries (France, Germany, Canada, Japan, etc.) by the Commerce Department has found that all rely on pharmaceutical price controls, which prevent drug companies from charging a market-based price for their products. The low price is achieved through what economists call "monopsony power" — the power that a single buyer (in this case a nationalized health care system) has over multiple sellers. Prices for patented drugs that are 18 percent to 67 percent less than U.S. prices, depending on country.

These policies may look good in the short term, but they have reduced health care quality for these countries and have forced the export of their R&D operations to the United States. Eight of the world’s 10 top-selling drugs are produced by companies headquartered here.

Research has shown clearly that price control policies in hurt Europeans themselves. The annual economic loss in Germany is $3 billion annually, says a 2004 study by Bain & Co.

But Europe’s policies also hurt Americans, not to mention Ugandans and Bolivians.

The Commerce report notes that if current European policies were reversed, global R&D would be increased to a level that "could lead to three or four new molecular entities (drugs) annually."

It’s U.S. consumers who are getting the shaft. We pay while they get a free ride. The benefit to American purchasers "if there were no price controls (in Europe) is in the range of $5 billion to $7 billion per year," says the study.

The drug policies in Europe, Japan and Canada are quite simply a trade issue. It’s not time to go to the World Trade Organization just yet, but the office of the U.S. trade representative should be exerting pressure immediately in bilateral talks with countries like Germany.

Counterproductive price controls must end. The health of the world is at stake.

James K. Glassman is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and host of TechCentralStation.com.


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006