America put me out of business homepage
1357  days in business since  challenge
3060  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

Older people divided on Medicare drug plan

Posted At Grand Forks Herald

BY : Kevin Freking

Medicare beneficiaries are not enthused about the program's new prescription drug benefit, which begins enrolling its first participants Tuesday.

A survey of older people finds them divided into three camps:

_37 percent view the program unfavorably.

_31 percent have a favorable opinion.

_31 percent said they just do not know enough about the benefit to have an opinion.

"Seniors still are having a hard time. Seniors still aren't really prepared, and they're going to need a lot of help to make the choices they need to make under the law," said Dr. Drew Altman, president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, which undertook the survey with the Harvard School of Public Health.

The foundation conducts health research and has no affiliation with any company providing prescription drug coverage through Medicare.

Many beneficiaries already have drug coverage. That factor was listed as the No. 1 reason why people would not be enrolling in a private plan this year.

"When you look at the people who say they don't plan to enroll, it's mainly because they already have coverage. They have coverage through a former employer or through a Medicare health plan, and that's just great," said Mark McClellan, administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Among those surveyed who said they lacked drug coverage, only 28 percent said they would enroll. Twenty-three percent said they would not and 49 percent did not know.

"It depends a little bit upon which survey you see," McClellan said. "I can get five other numbers from other places that show a lot of interest in enrolling among people who don't have coverage now."

The survey, taken through telephone interviews of 802 respondents Oct. 13-31, has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.

Altman said it will take a year or so to get a sense of what beneficiaries think about the law.

"It's just too complicated for them to get it from a brochure, or a Web site, or to answer the critical question of, 'What does this mean for me?'" Altman said. "Unfortunately, it's going to take a real world test for us to figure out whether this works or doesn't work."

John Rother, director of policy and strategy at AARP, said he is not surprised that people have yet to warm up to the drug benefit.

"This was a program enacted as part of a very high-profile, partisan controversy," Rother said. "And the other thing is, the benefit is not what people had hoped to see."

Rother said AARP, which has partnered with an insurer to provide a drug plan, believes people should view the drug coverage much like homeowner's or car insurance.

"It's really peace of mind that you're buying," he said. The program has an out-of-pocket cap feature that limits the yearly amount a particular participant would have to pay for medicines.

Congress passed a prescription drug benefit in 2003 as part of the Medicare Modernization Act. Under the program, beneficiaries can voluntarily enroll in a private plan that pays for a portion of their prescription drugs.

People will pay a monthly premium, an annual deductible and a portion of each prescription. Additional financial aid will be provided to those with low incomes.

The federal government will spend an estimated $720 billion over the next 10 years to subsidize beneficiaries' drug purchases.

The inspector general for the Health and Human Services Department recommending on Wednesday that the government be prepared to give millions of older people personal attention if they expect them to enroll.


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006