America put me out of business homepage
1357  days in business since  challenge
3060  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

Pharmaceutical Industry Scores Win as Drug Initiatives Fail

Posted At PE.com

BY : Paul Elias

Even in defeat, the pharmaceutical industry's $80 million no-holds-barred campaign scored a big victory in the ballot-box battle over prescription drug discounts.

Although voters on Tuesday rejected the industry's own discount drug proposal, Proposition 78, they also turned back Proposition 79, a more liberal initiative.

The latter measure, supported by organized labor and consumer groups, would have coerced pharmaceutical companies to steeply discount prescription drugs for some 10 million Californians without health insurance.Proposition 78 would have made such a discount program voluntary.

Pre-election polls indicated the competing measures left many voters confused.

"Defeating Proposition 79 was the top priority for the drug companies," said Jack Pitney, a political science professor at Claremont McKenna College. "If voters got confused that probably suited the pharmaceutical industry."

With 88 percent of precincts reporting, Proposition 79 lost 61 percent to 39 percent. The drug industry-sponsored Proposition 78 also lost, 58 percent to 42 percent, with 88 percent of precincts reporting.

Fronted by its powerful Washington-based lobbying outfit, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the drug industry spent $50 million on a statewide media blitz and another $13 million on glossy mailers and other campaign literature in an effort to defeat Proposition 79. The measure would have required companies to give steep discounts to uninsured Californians if they wanted to participate in the state's Medi-Cal program, which provides about $4 billion in drugs annually to poor and elderly people.

The lobbying group, also known as PHrMA, said Proposition 79 would have punished the poor patients served by Medi-Cal by making it harder for them to get drugs from companies that refused to participate in the discount program.

"We were confident voters saw it was a flawed policy," said PHrMA spokeswoman Denise Davis. "We're pleased with the fact that voters recognized that Proposition 79 would hurt poor people and would not help uninsured Californians have access to affordable lifesaving medicine."

Drug titans Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Merck and GlaxoSmithKline each contributed $9.8 million.

It was money that helped pay for several high-profile political consultants, including former Assembly Speaker and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, as well as for glossy mass mailers that became controversial in the days before Tuesday's election. One flier targeting black California voters pictured 12 prominent black lawmakers next to an endorsement of Proposition 78, which some of them strongly opposed.

Proposition 79's backers were badly outspent, raising about $2 million for their campaign.

"In order to defeat, the companies had to spend a record-breaking $80 million and resort to dirty tricks," said Anthony Wright, who led the Proposition 79 campaign. "However, the voters rejected the drug companies' attempt to buy this election, including their attempts to prevent future price reforms."

Both sides vowed to renew their battles in the Legislature.

"We pledge to work with the governor, state lawmakers and state government officials to make sure uninsured low-income Californians have access to affordable lifesaving medication," said PhRMA spokeswoman Davis.

Wright said that "by sponsoring their own measure, drug companies have admitted that drug prices are too high."

Analysts said the bare-knuckles campaign underscored just how concerned pharmaceutical companies were that other states would follow California's example, forcing them to discount drugs for millions of uninsured residents.

Proposition 79 also would have punished drug makers who refused to give discounts by removing them from a lucrative government list of drugs that doctors can prescribe Medi-Cal patients without receiving approval. Additionally, the measure provided for individuals to sue drug companies if they believed the companies engaged in illegal profiteering, a provision the industry said would open it to a wave of lawsuits.


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006