America put me out of business homepage
1357  days in business since  challenge
3060  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

The Pressure to Legalize Drug Importation in the United States may Become Irresistable in the Coming Months

Posted At Pharma Live

BY : Senator John F. Kerry

Read inside Pharmaceutical Pricing, Reimbursement, and Prescribing News in the First Quarter of 2005

Research and Markets (http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/c31612) has announced the addition of Pharmaceutical Pricing, Reimbursement, and Prescribing News in the First Quarter of 2005 to their offering. The first quarter of 2005 was relatively quiet in the pricing, reimbursement, and prescribing environments of the worlds major pharmaceutical markets. The United States continued the implementation of the Medicare Modernization Act; the acts new prescription drug benefit is expected to give a substantial boost to pharmaceutical sales. At the same time, some members of Congress, state governments, and large employers pursued measures to reduce prescription drug prices in the United States. Several leading pharmaceutical companies responded to growing criticism of their prices by launching a new drug discount card. In Europe, governments sought ways to refine their well-established cost-containment strategies. Reference pricing provoked controversy in France and Germany, and the relatively underdeveloped generics markets of Southern Europe continued to grow. In Japan, industry observers saw signs of increasing pressure for reform of the pricing and reimbursement system.

Business Implications

The new Medicare prescription drug benefit is scheduled to begin operation on January 1, 2006. Prescription drug plans (PDPs) will be required to cover at least two drugs in each therapeutic category and pharmacological class. However, if a given category or class contains only two drugs, the PDP may limit coverage to a single agent within that category or class. Plans will not be obliged to cover off-label prescribing, and they will be permitted to use mechanisms such as prior authorization, step therapy protocols, generics substitution, and quantity limits to restrict access to certain drugs. PDPs will have to promote the use of generics by requiring the display of information on less expensive generic versions of a drug (if available) at the point of sale.

The pressure to legalize drug importation in the United States may become irresistible in the coming months. Two drug importation bills have been revived in Congress. A sponsor of one of the bills predicted that legislation to legalize drug importation will be passed by a margin of 75-25 votes, a majority that would make it difficult for the Bush administration to maintain its opposition. The pharmaceutical industry's best hope of avoiding massive drug importation in the United States may be that Canada will act to ban this trade and that other potential parallel export markets will follow suit to protect their pharmaceutical supply systems.

The European Commission recently reaffirmed its resolve to implement the recommendations of the G10 Medicines Group. If the commission keeps its word, manufacturers can look forward to faster registration and market access for innovative drugs, streamlined pricing and reimbursement decisions at the member-state level, free pricing for drugs that are not purchased or reimbursed by member states, easier Rx-to-OTC switching and the freedom to continue using the same trademark for drugs switched to nonprescription status, the abolition of restrictions on the advertising of nonprescription medicines, and the introduction of measures to limit parallel imports from new member states in Central and Eastern Europe.

The impact of Germany's expanded and more aggressive reference pricing system will be studied with interest not just in that country but throughout Europe. Many governments have followed the lead that Germany set in 1989 by introducing reference pricing, but none have been as bold as the pioneer of this approach to cost containment. Pfizer and other companies that have taken legal action against reference pricing decisions will anxiously wait to see the outcome of their lawsuits in Germany. The pharmaceutical industry as a whole will anxiously wait to see if other European governments decide to extend reference pricing to patent-protected drugs.


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006