America put me out of business homepage
1355  days in business since  challenge
3058  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

Seniors pleasantly surprised by plan's low drug costs

Posted At NorthJersey.com

BY : Jessica Adler

Bill Mayer used to get his prescription drugs via mail-order from overseas. Although that is against the law, he wasn't ashamed of doing it. Like many of the estimated 2 million Americans who buy medication from outside the United States, the high price of domestic drugs angered him, and he considered it his right to shop around."I would have to be, as a knowledgeable senior, crazy, out of my mind, to go into a drug store in the United States and order 100 Zocor and pay over $300 when I can get the same item for $100 overseas," he told the Herald News in August 2004.

These days, Bill Mayer, who is 71 and lives in Monroe Township, is a lot less frustrated. In December, he signed up for Medicare Part D drug coverage.

"I was very surprised," Mayer said, recalling his research, in late autumn, on Part D at www.medicare.gov. "It came out that with my three prescriptions (two heart medications, Altace and Toprol-XL, and a cholesterol medication, Vytorin) I had a very sizable savings."

According to a report from AARP, many people could be in a similar situation. It's worthwhile for all seniors ----including those who get their drugs from Canada ----to consider enrolling in a Medicare Part D plan before May 15, 2006, when a late enrollment penalty kicks in, said the report, which was published in the January edition of the AARP Bulletin.

"People cannot tell how they are going to fare and they should do the math, even if they think that they're not going to do better on Medicare," said Patricia Barry, the report's author. "They may be surprised."

AARP supported the Medicare Modernization Act in 2003, which established the drug benefit, and offers a Part D plan of its own.

The study examined how much five seniors would pay annually for their drugs if they enrolled in a local Medicare Part D plan instead of ordering from the online Canadian pharmacy, www.globaldrugsdirect.com. Four of the five would save money with a Part D plan, the report concluded.

"Nearly all our interviewees (who hailed from North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and California) would be better off financially, by varying amounts, under a Medicare plan ----with those using the most drugs potentially reaping the greatest savings over the year," the report found.

It's a tough crowd, though. One Clifton woman who mail-orders drugs from Canada (because that's a crime, she didn't want her name printed) refuses to even consider switching to a Part D plan. It's too confusing, she said.

The number of prescription drug orders to Canadian pharmacies from people in the U.S. is down about 10-to-15 percent since Part D benefits took effect on Jan. 1, said Andy Troszok, president of the Canadian International Pharmacy Association, a nonprofit trade association of 50 Canadian pharmacies. The drop is still relatively small, especially since mail orders also come from younger Americans, who aren't eligible for the new drug coverage.

Of New Jersey's 1.2 million Medicare beneficiaries, 238,000 have voluntarily signed up for a Part D plan, according to data released last week from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Another 135,000 were automatically enrolled in the program from Medicaid. Nationwide, 8.6 million (of 42 million) beneficiaries have signed up, and 5.6 million were automatically enrolled.

People who aren't signing up because they get their drugs from Canada could be missing the boat, according to AARP's report. "Many who choose the least expensive Medicare drug plan in their area that covers all their drugs could pay less this year than getting those same drugs from Canada..." it said. "That calculation takes into account all their out-of-pocket costs under a Medicare plan through 2006, including premiums, deductibles and payments for drugs."

Of the five seniors in the study, Donna, from Anaheim, Cal., takes the most drugs (six, including Actos, Fosamax, and Zocor) and would reap the most savings by enrolling in Part D. Her best Part D option would cost about $2,324 annually -- $1,395 less than ordering from Canada. John, from Muskogee, Okla., who takes two drugs (Aggrenox and Synthroid), would save $300 a year by enrolling in his state's Part D plan. Of the five seniors featured in the study, only one would fare worse by signing up for Part D: Joyce, from Charlotte, N.C., would pay $134 annually for Premarin, her only prescription drug, ordering from Canada, compared to $433.36 for her best Part D option.

Prospective savings ----like Part D plan options themselves -- vary depending on an individual's state of residence and specific drug needs.

If they lived in New Jersey, three of the five featured seniors would save money by signing up for a Part D plan, according to the Drug Plan Finder at www.medicare.gov. John, who only takes two drugs, would save about $500; Joyce, who only takes Premarin, would spend about $200 more per year. And Elaine, whose four drugs cost $2,334 when she orders from Canada, would spend about $50 more on a New Jersey Part D plan.

Bill Mayer of Monroe Township, says he will spend a bit more than $600 a year on his Medicare Part D plan -- about $1,100 less than he was spending on Canadian drugs and buying from discount retailers like Costco.

"(Finding a Part D plan) requires that you do your homework and a lot of seniors don't enjoy doing homework," said Mayer, who travels throughout the state as AARP's New Jersey communication coordinator.

His affiliation with AARP has nothing to do with his decision to sign up, he said, adding that like many of his peers, he initially was skeptical of the benefit. That changed once he looked into it further, he said: "(My savings) are black and white."

But Mayer had another reason for signing up: He also wanted to avoid the life-long premium penalties he would incur if he enrolled May 15.

For those considering doing the same, it need not be all-or-nothing, said Troszok, of the Canadian International Pharmacy Association. Some customers, who take only one or two drugs, are choosing to enroll in the cheapest Part D plan available, to avoid the late sign-up fee, while continuing to order from Canada. Others plan to order from Canada once they hit their "donut hole" ----the gap in coverage in some Part D plans once a beneficiary spends more than $2,500 but less than $5,100.

"We're not telling people that Part D is not going to work; we're saying assess it for yourself, put Canada in the mix, see where you come out," Troszok said. "Canada has been around for five years in terms of a robust Canadian mail order program. Next year, (Medicare Part D premiums) have the ability to go up, drug prices can change."

Those ideas aren't lost on Mayer. Premiums will almost certainly increase in 2007, though they must remain within Medicare guidelines. And Mayer dislikes the fact that prices can fluctuate any time under his new drug plan.

Still, when he factored in his savings and the prospect of a late enrollment penalty, signing on to Part D, he said, "was a no-brainer."


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006