America put me out of business homepage
1413  days in business since  challenge
3116  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

Nevada panel gathering opinions on Canada drug plan

Posted At Lasvegassun.com

BY : Associated Press

State Pharmacy Board members are reserving judgment on whether to go forward with a plan allowing Nevada residents to buy prescription drugs from Canada at reduced cost.

Attorney General George Chanos said last week that the program can't go forward because drugs imported from Canada don't meet U.S. Food and Drug Administration standards, which encompass more than just the chemical makeup of a drug.

"The Board of Pharmacy put a lot of effort into it to make it work, but it's been a bit muddled up," said Joe Kellogg, president of the seven-member panel. "We're just waiting for our counsel to explain it to us."

The attorney general's opinion, sought by this country's pharmaceutical industry, conflicts with a Legislative Counsel Bureau opinion stating that the program could be implemented while still complying with FDA regulations.

Assembly Majority Leader Barbara Buckley, D-Las Vegas, sought the legislation. She plans to attend the board meeting to ask the panel to move forward based on the Legislature's legal opinion.

The discussion of the conflicting opinions will occur Jan. 12, when the board meets in Las Vegas to discuss the issue.

Board member Katie Craven said she had just received the attorney general's opinion and had yet to read it.

"My biggest concern is the patient safety issue," she said. "I want to make sure that if we do go through with this, if this is a go and the FDA is good with this, that it is safe for patients."

Board member Keith Macdonald said he too would wait to hear the discussion by the attorney general's office, Buckley and others before deciding whether to proceed.

Macdonald added he has no strong feelings one way or the other about the Canadian drug plan, sought by some lawmakers to provide cheaper prescription drugs to Nevadans with no health insurance.

Brand-name drugs range from 30 percent to 50 percent cheaper in Canada because they are sold under government price controls.

Eight states, several cities and the District of Columbia operate programs similar to the proposed Nevada program, in opposition to the Bush administration's stance that prescription drug imports can be unsafe.


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006