America put me out of business homepage
1357  days in business since  challenge
3060  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

Dems keep up Medicare attacks

Posted At M&C News

BY : Todd Zwillich

Experts warned Monday that access problems plaguing Medicare`s new prescription drug benefit will continue unless Congress makes changes to the program.

The comments came during a hearing convened by Senate Democrats, who have criticized the benefit, known as Medicare Part D, and are vowing attempts to alter some of its more unpopular features.

As many as 600,000 low-income seniors were over-charged for prescriptions or denied benefits when their drug coverage was automatically switched from Medicaid to Medicare on January 1.

The Bush Administration blamed computer problems and agreed to reimburse more than 40 states for the cost of emergency medications given to seniors.

Medicare officials said last week that private health plans have cut the problems by about two-thirds. But witnesses told the committee that Part D`s design will continue to cause problems for low income seniors.

Tim Westmoreland, a professor at Georgetown University`s Health Policy Institute, said that 'dual eligibles'--seniors who qualify for Medicaid and Medicare--will continue to face delays as they transition each year from Medicaid`s state-run rolls to private formularies carrying Medicare.

'Medicare Part D as currently constructed guarantees a never-ending transition,' he said.

Democrats have also attacked the Republican-authored program for offering too many plans to seniors. Beneficiaries are asked to choose between 40 or more competing plans with varying premiums and amounts of coverage.

President Bush used part of his weekly radio address Saturday to defend the program. More than 25 million people with Medicare now have prescription drug coverage, and hundreds of thousands more are enrolling each week,' he said.

Approximately 5.4 million seniors have enrolled who did not already have drug coverage through an employer or the government, according to federal figures released last week.

Health and Human Services Secretary Michael Leavitt told reporters last week that market competition would eventually 'shakeout' some poorly-performing plans from the system.

Westmoreland warned that the expected shakeout would force some seniors already in Medicare back into a maze of plan selection.

'Any (beneficiary) enrolled in disappearing plan will have to start over,' he said.

The hearing came on the heels of a week-long congressional recess which Democrats used to hold events throughout the country criticizing the new Medicare plan.

Democrats hold a public opinion advantage over Republican on Medicare and other health issues, and have vowed to push legislative changes to the program.

One amendment would extend a May 15 sign-up deadline until the end of 2006 for seniors who are confused by multiple plan choices.

'That ought to be the first baby step that Congress takes,' said Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., chair of the Democratic Policy Committee, which called Monday`s hearing.

Democrats also enjoy limited bipartisan support for an effort to repeal a part of the Medicare law barring the federal government from negotiating with drug makers for lower medication prices.

A coverage gap mandated by Congress cuts off benefits between $2,250 and $5,100 in personal drug spending, in an effort to control Part D`s costs. Gerard Anderson, a health policy professor at Johns Hopkins University and a former Medicare official, told lawmakers that the so-called coverage 'donut hole' is needed because prices remain high.

'The donut hole could be completely eliminated if the United States paid the same as Canada, the United Kingdom, or France' for drugs, he said.

In an interview, Dorgan said that there was 'no question' that Democrats try to amend the drug plan during the coming election year. 'If the administration continues to insist that it will not make any changes, should that be an issue in the political system? Should that be a political issue? The answer is, `yes`,' Dorgan said.

Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said that lawmaker could offer amendments on bills 'within weeks.'


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006