America put me out of business homepage
1355  days in business since  challenge
3058  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

For a happy, healthy 2006, the prescription drug plan must be fixed

Posted At The Hill

BY : Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.)

Medicare was enacted 40 years ago as a promise to the American people that, in exchange for their years of hard work and service to our country, their healthcare would be guaranteed in their golden years.

America’s senior citizens deserve a comprehensive and affordable healthcare system — and that includes a guaranteed, simple and affordable prescription-drug benefit. The Bush plan fails to meet that standard. In fact, the Medicare prescription-drug law is doing more harm than good. America’s seniors can attest to that.

In some states, as many as 20 percent of elderly Medicaid recipients have seen their coverage denied. Already overburdened states are being forced to pick up the tab for the White House’s incompetence, to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars. Insurance and pharmaceutical companies are no doubt thrilled with their profits, but this latest Bush boondoggle is a real-life nightmare for state budgets and, worse, for millions of seniors just looking to fill a needed prescription.

Seniors were first subjected to the dizzying task of choosing a plan among a slew of competing programs. Yet among the countless pages of confusing information, seniors could not find out the one thing they really wanted to know: Would their drugs be covered under this plan? I know accomplished health professionals who were unable to help their parents navigate the maze of paperwork and regulations.

To make matters worse, seniors are not only locked into the first plan they choose, they face a financial penalty for delaying that choice. Every day, my office receives hundreds of calls from nervous, confused and worried seniors. And they have every right to be concerned: Their options are incredibly confusing, and the government is burdening them with unnecessary pressure on their time and finances.

Even the seniors lucky enough to make sense of this new plan now understand that this prescription benefit was falsely advertised. They realize this law, despite all the promises, uses a series of holes in coverage and complex rules to provide shockingly skimpy benefits. Now that we’re seeing the results, our worst fears have been confirmed: wide gaps in coverage, seniors being forced into HMO-style plans, and no price controls. Eventually, elements of this law may even lead to the privatization of Medicare.

Our seniors deserve better than this, and it’s going to take more than the competent administering President Bush’s program now lacks. The time has come to renew our efforts, go back to the drawing board and give our seniors a real prescription-drug benefit.

But if Republicans in Congress are unwilling to start over, we must at least perform some major surgery on the current law. To begin, we must:

Simplify the rules, streamline choices, require more transparency and extend deadlines for making decisions about coverage options.

Make the benefit comprehensive, and end the outrage of charging seniors premiums even after their benefits shut down.

Restrain double-digit drug-price increases and lower out-of-pocket costs for seniors by allowing the federal government to use its bulk purchasing power to negotiate volume discounts on behalf of all beneficiaries.

Allow for the safe reimportation of affordable prescription drugs from Canada and other industrialized countries.

Improve the protections for retiree benefits. Millions of seniors are projected to lose their gold-plated retiree prescription-drug plans and be forced into a lesser benefit under the Medicare plan. This is wrong, and we must prevent it from happening.

Cancel the unprecedented $12 billion slush fund to entice private insurance companies to participate in Medicare. If private companies are unwilling to engage in fair competition for customers, the federal government should stand ready to offer a plan as a part of its Medicare package. The $12 billion is better used investing in an expanded benefit for seniors than in a massive corporate handout.

Affordable healthcare is not a privilege for the elected, the connected and the wealthy; it should be a right afforded to all Americans, regardless of their background or social standing. President Bush’s prescription-drug program soundly rejects this principle, and we have to pass serious reforms now to repair this program before it becomes entrenched.

Our goal should be nothing more and nothing less than assuring that a Medicare prescription-drug plan actually does what it’s supposed to do: conveniently provide affordable prescription drugs to all seniors.


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006