America put me out of business homepage
1355  days in business since  challenge
3058  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

Medicare, Medicaid Take Hits from House as Budget Bill Goes to Senate Today

Posted At Senior Journal

BY : Jane Erikson

The Senate is expected to vote today on the Budget Reconciliation Act passed by the House in the early morning hours that is estimated to reduce the Federal Budget by just under $40 billion. Significant cuts will be made in Medicaid and Medicare under the bill.A major surprise is a one year freeze on payments to home health care providers, which many see as a significant blow to this industry that is popular with senior citizens. This had not been in earlier budget reduction proposals. Observers believe the freeze was due to a recent Medicare Payment Advisory Commission finding that home health Medicare profit margins are currently in the 16 to 17% range.

It was also surprising because many states and other lawmakers have been developing new ways to encourage home health care, saying it is less costly to government than nursing homes.

The largest cut in Medicare will be a reduction of funding for the private Health Maintenance Organizations that was established in the 2003 Medicare bill. These plans are part of the Medicare Advantage option and the 2003 legislation was designed to encourage them to participate in Medicare, working on the assumption that these plans save money for Medicare over traditional Medicare health coverage.

Total Medicare cuts are anticipated to reduce the budget about $8 billion.

The House increased spending on physicians, however, by cancelling a planned 4.4 percent reduction in payments to doctors in the Medicare plan. This is expected to increase costs of $7.3 billion. The budget calls for Medicare physician payments to be frozen at FY 2005 levels.

Medicaid will be cut about $5 billion, with most of that coming on tighter restrictions of the rules for seniors to transfer assets out of their name – primarily to children – in order to qualify for Medicaid assistance with nursing home costs. (See more on asset transfers below this report.)

The bill passed the House by a 212-206 vote and the Senate must act before the holiday recess.

"This conference report on the Deficit Reduction Act makes government run better by making some commonsense reforms," said House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.).

"It includes market based Medicaid reforms that both Republican and Democratic governors - who pay 43 percent of the program's cost - have been begging for. One of those reforms includes starting a demonstration project to give states the flexibility to offer Health Opportunity Accounts for Medicaid beneficiaries. We are also giving Governors the flexibility they need to better serve their Medicaid House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said, " It is shameful that this Congress will adjourn passing this immoral budget, meeting the greed of the special interest friends of the Republicans instead of the needs of the American people."

"With this budget, do we say, 'God bless you' when we leave here without extending the time our seniors need to understand the befuddling prescription drug plans that have been handed to them with a time limit? Democrats have a better idea, extending the time for seniors to enroll and lowering the cost of prescription drugs. But no, the pharmaceutical industry goose is getting fat off this Congress at the expense of America's seniors," Pelosi added.

Although the bill will reach the Senate vote today, the vote may be later in the week. Some moderate Republican senators have been "rankled" by proposals to increase Medicaid beneficiaries' costs, CQ Today reports. For example, Sen. Gordon Smith (R-Ore.) and six other moderate Republicans in a letter last week asked Frist to avoid changes that would increase Medicaid beneficiaries' costs. According to CQ Today, it is not clear whether those senators will vote for the spending cut package (Schuler, CQ Today, 12/19).

More on the Medicaid Asset Transfer Provisions from ElderLawAnswers.com

The bill places major new restrictions on the ability of the elderly to transfer assets before qualifying for Medicaid coverage of nursing home care. The bill, a compromise between House and Senate budget bills hammered out by Republican leaders, now must be approved by the Senate, an action that could come quickly as lawmakers rush to leave town for the holidays.

The bill retains changes in the transfer rules that were part of the earlier House bill. It would extend Medicaid's "lookback" period for all asset transfers from three to five years and change the start of the penalty period for transferred assets from the date of transfer to "the date on which the individual is eligible for medical assistance under the State plan and is receiving services . . . but for the application of the penalty period, whichever is later. . . ". The bill also would make any individual with home equity above $750,000 ineligible for Medicaid nursing home care.

The House bill would also:

Establish new rules for the treatment of annuities, including a requirement that the state be named as the remainder beneficiary.

Require Medicaid applicants to provide "full information . . . concerning any transaction involving the transfer or disposal of assets during the previous period of 60 months, if the transaction exceeded $100,000, without regard to whether the transfer or disposal was for fair market value."

Allow Continuing Care Retirement Communities (CCRCs) to require residents to spend down their declared resources before applying for medical assistance.

Set forth rules under which an individual's CCRC entrance fee is considered an available resource.

Extend long-term care partnership programs to any state.

Kirsten Sloan, chief health lobbyist for AARP, said, "AARP strongly opposes the current conference agreement. This is irresponsible policy and will harm millions of low-income Medicaid beneficiaries, millions of older persons who need long-term care and unfairly increases Part B premiums for all Medicare beneficiaries."

For the full text of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, click on: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:S.1932: Click on the third version of the bill listed, then scroll down to Title III, Chapter 2, for the asset transfer rule changes. 12/21/2005 recipients."


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006