America put me out of business homepage
1355  days in business since  challenge
3058  days dispensing drugs to  the us
Don't let drug companies like Pfizer put me Daren Jorgenson out of business by continuing to cut off supply to our pharmacies around the world if we sell their products to Americans. I want you to put me out of business by forcing these drug companies to sell their products to American Pharmacies at fair and reasonable prices.Daren Jorgenson Bsc PharmI want Americans to put me out of business the right way!
CanadaMeds.comAmerican Drug ClubCanadaRx.com
DAILY NEWS ARTICLES
WEEKLY NEWS ARTICLE
WEEKLY POLITICAL COMMENTS
DAILY POLITICAL NEWS ARTICLES
Political Supporters of Drug re-importation
JOHN KERRY SPEAKS

Click here to view Darens message to the American people.
MICHAEL MOORE COMMENTARIES
Toll Free
1-877-855-6995

Fax
1-877-855-6996
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Is Legalizing the purchase of prescription drugs from Canada the Answer?
 

Many on Medicare decide to skip Part D scramble

Posted At AzStarNet.com

BY : Jane Erikson

Medicare experts are encouraging seniors faced with dozens of prescription drug plan options to stay with their current coverage next year if possible — and many are doing just that.
More than 50 health plans are offering the new Medicare Part D drug benefit in Pima County next year, and government officials say having all those choices is good for seniors.
But experts with Medicare, Social Security and the Pima Council on Aging say most people do well to avoid all those choices. "It's only people who don't have coverage as good as Part D who are encouraged to switch," said Stewart Grabel, ombudsman for Pima Council on Aging.
A Medicare spokesman in Washington, D.C., agrees.
"As long as what you have is as good as Medicare — that's the key," said Peter Ashkenaz. "If their coverage is at least as good as Part D, and they like their coverage, they should stay put."
Those doing just that include Pat Fritscher, 78, of Tucson, who has studied her information packet from PacifiCare's Secure Horizons, the Medicare HMO she's been with for six years.
"Oh Lord, is it complicated," Fritscher said this week. "I'm inclined to stay where I am. It's just much simpler. And the simpler the better for me."
Enrollment for the new benefit started Nov. 15 and continues through Dec. 31 for coverage starting Jan. 1.
For the first time in Medicare's 40-year history, all 43 million Americans in the program will be able to join a plan that offers prescription-drug coverage. Before, such coverage was limited mostly to beneficiaries in larger communities.
Fritscher's Secure Horizons plan, like other "Medicare Advantage" plans, will include the new Part D benefit next year. The plan will cover brand-name as well as generic drugs. It also includes a "doughnut hole," or coverage gap, when Fritscher will have to pay 100 percent of her plan's negotiated price for medications.
But if her prescription costs exceed $5,100, Part D will pay 95 percent of the cost of any medications she needs for the rest of the year.
Part D offers "richer" coverage than most people on Medicare now have. But the vast number of health plan choices and all the new details — from doughnut holes to late fees — are putting many people into a panic.
For them, staying put seems the safest option.
"That's the sense I'm getting," said Dan Chavez, district manager for Social Security in Tucson. "We've done over 180 outreach events since May 1. Most people say they're going to stay with the coverage they have."
The experts have no enrollment figures yet.
But only 60 people showed up last Sunday for a well-publicized opportunity to meet with Medicare officials from San Francisco and get one-on-one advice on the new Part D benefit. Chavez and others interpreted that as further evidence that people are avoiding change.
"I think it's true — people are staying with what they've got," said Grabel, of the Pima Council on Aging. "I also believe that this whole thing is too complicated. . . . We have doctors and lawyers and other professionals who can't figure this out."
Ann and Ron Skwartz of Tucson say they have figured it out — and unlike Pat Fritscher and others, they are going to try a new plan next year. They've been with Secure Horizons for several years but now they're going to switch to United Healthcare's Medicare Complete.
"We've talked about it and talked about it and been to seminars and been to seminars," Ann Skwartz said. "We've done a lot of homework on this. One day we came home from a seminar and we spent most of the day and went through the Pacificare book and the United book to see what the differences were."
The couple spent about $4,000 on prescription drugs in the first nine months of this year, and they feel they can save more money with United. It won't pay for their "Silver Sneakers" gym memberships, but they feel they will save enough money on medications to buy their own memberships.
Those who are still uncertain can take comfort in the fact that if the coverage they choose starting Jan. 1 turns out to be a disappointment, they can change plans once again before May 15. Then they're locked in until Jan. 1, 2007.
But will there be as many plans to choose from then? "It's too early to tell," said Medicare's Ashkenaz.


ARTICLES OF THE DAY

Bill to allow pharmacies to reimport drugs passes Senate

The Oklahoma Senate backs a drug reimportation plan that would permit state pharmacies to obtain U-S-made prescription drugs from Canada and elsewhere for sale here.The Federal Drug Administration has opposed drug reimportation bills, claiming they violate the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U-S Constitution. Those measures mainly deal with allowing individuals to obtain reimported drugs. Tulsa state Senator Tom Adelson says his legislation avoids that legal question because it would require pharmacies to sell reimported medicines only to Oklahomans in intrastate, not interstate, commerce. Most programs are geared to allowing individuals obtain such drugs by crossing the border into Canada or buying drugs online.

March 08, 2006

Democrats allege bad deal on drugs

Bay Area seniors are not saving significant money under Medicare's new prescription drug program, according to a report released Monday by most of the Bay Area's House Democrats. The report says Bay Area prices for 2004's 10 best-selling prescription drugs among seniors are 75 percent higher under the new Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit than under deals negotiated by the federal government at other agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs. Medicare Part D's prices also are 60 percent higher than those paid by consumers in Canada; almost 5 percent higher than prices on Drugstore.com; and almost 2 percent higher than prices at Costco, the report found. But Republicans who shepherded the bill through Congress rejected a proposal to let Medicare negotiate with drug companies for lower prices. The report proves "what we've been saying since the debate on the Republican Medicare drug bill began," said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont, in a news release. "If you create a privatized drug benefit and refuse to let the government negotiate lower prices, senior citizens and people with disabilities will pay the price," said Stark, who as ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee's Health Subcommittee is particularly outspoken on the issue. "Instead of attempting to set Medicare on the road to privatization, Republicans in Congress should have worked with Democrats to establish a real prescription benefit within Medicare."

March 08, 2006